California employers often require employees, as a condition of employment or continued employment, to sign a document agreeing to have any future employment claims determined in accordance with another state’s laws (“choice of law” provision).
Such documents often also designate foreign states (or even foreign countries) as the only appropriate location for such claims (“choice of forum” provision).
These provisions have both the purpose and effect of depriving California employees of the rights guaranteed to them under California’s strong employment laws. For example, an employee terminated by her employer because of her recently announced pregnancy will likely forego her right to sue her employer for wrongful termination when she realizes she must file her in...
From our point of view, there is little fairness for employees subject to arbitration agreements. This is the second post in a two-part series - part one covered Getting Educated About The Facts.
It's All About FairnessAs a matter of course of business, many employers insist that their employees agree to arbitrate any and all claims arising out of their employment as a condition of employment.

When an employer terminates an employee from his/her employment, the employer in many cases will offer the employee a separation or severance agreement that provides continuing pay and/or benefits for several weeks or even several months.
Unless such separation or severance pay was offered as a hiring or retention incentive (i.e., contractually guaranteed) or pursuant to the closing of operations for certain large employers, separation or severance pay is not legally required.
Employers often offer small amounts of separation or severance pay to avoid the prospect of protracted and expensive litigation with former employees. In exchange for the severance benefits, the employer receives the employee's written agreement not to sue the employer at any time in the future...
Get legal industry updates via email